News Headlines
- Fri, May 24
- Tiny Tina takes over Twitter, Borderlands 2's 'Tiny Tina's Assault on Dragon Keep' DLC reveal incoming
- Rumor: Xbox One used game policy detailed by retailers [Update: Microsoft statement released]
- Thu, May 23
- Shin Megami Tensei IV's 'The Samurai Way' trailer prepares aspiring demon vanquishers
- Saints Row 4 trailer video series focuses on the completely randomness of Saints Row
- Ninja Theory, developers of DMC: Devil May Cry, tease "something new to show" for tomorrow
New Articles
Related Articles
Currently the most popular chipset for a single CPU Athlon system is the KT333. It supports things like ATA 133 and DDR333 that have quickly become standards. Most KT333 board manufacturers have opted to use an asynchronous bus to support DDR333 instead of adding in a 1/5 divider and supporting a true 166Mhz bus. I'm not a big fan of this at all. The gains of running an asynchronous bus aren't as big as you'd expect.
I was doing a bit of testing for myself wondering how much faster things would be when running a true 166Mhz FSB instead of using asynch. The gains are big enough to do a quick writeup :) In doing so I would like to stress to all motherboard manufacturers *cough* MSI *cough* that it IS worth your time adding the extra divider! Some people out there actually believe that running an asynchronous bus is good enough. I don't believe it is! It should be better...
Most people out there have CPU's that can handle a 25% overclock or they at LEAST have them unlocked. Most clock generators being used on boards today support not only the 1/5 divider but often a 1/6 and 1/7 as well. Most companies out there have started giving us options for these insane bus speeds (some as high and over 250Mhz) yet most of them only support a 1/4 divider and the GOOD ones support a 1/5. I can't help but rant... The clock generators on most boards that come through here support 1/5, 1/6 and 1/7 PCI dividers yet they're never added. We see things like this all the time. Do the companies not realize there's simple software things that they can do to make their board considerably better? I dig around chipset registers a lot so I generally have a pretty good idea of what could be added to a BIOS. That only gets me mad when some big tweaks/features are left out. The only way that they will ever see a need to add these is if the hardware review sites out there ride them and dog them when there's a lot of things missing. Unfortunately most of the guys writing these reviews are just happy to get the free hardware.
For the best prices on KT333 boards click here.
Testing
We've seen 2 KT333 boards so far and I haven't been impressed at all by the asynchronous bus.
I am posting the exact memory and AGP settings that I use for all of our testing. Driver versions are also posted. All memory and AGP timings not noted here are left at their BIOS default.
RAM settings
Cas2
Precharge 2
RAS Pulse 5
Ras to Cas 2
4 way bank interleaving
1T Command rate
I have chosen to use highly tweaked memory timings to reduce things like latency and achieve higher overall bandwidth. I believe by doing this it may show
AGP settings
64Mb aperture
Fast writes enabled
AGP 4x
Other AGP read/write related items disabled
|
|
They utilize an oscilloscope to verify the 1/5 divider on the KT3. The only problem is MSI offers no official support for this hence no documentation or mention of it in the BIOS. I've personnally been running 166/166 on the KT3 for the last four months.
Weshy
I could comment about the substance of the article (which wasn't half bad), but I don't want that to distract from the following:
LEARN HOW TO DO A FREAKIN' GRAPH !!
If you can't figure out how to do a simple graph, that's fine, nobody's good at everything; just leave out the graphs altogether if you can't understand the concept of effective scaling. (Hint- When the largest and smallest scores are within a percent or two of each other, the largest should NOT be over twice as long as the smallest.) This exaggerated scaling does not help to illustrate the point when it's THAT far out of proportion.
Weshy, I second the hope that the GA-7VRXP supports them...I have a new one in a box sitting here waiting for my two Western Digital Special editions to arrive so that I can build my new box...
I think we've already been trying to reduce this type of exaggerated graphing. We're still gonna keep working on it.
Weshy.